Marte Ødegaard

• Varsi, Cecilie; Solberg Nes, Lise ; Kristjansdottir, Olöf Birna; Kelders, Saskia M.; Stenberg, Una & Zangi, Heidi Andersen [Show all 13 contributors for this article] (2019). Implementation strategies to enhance the implementation of ehealth programs for patients with chronic illnesses: Realist systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. ISSN 1438-8871. 21(9). doi: 10.2196/14255. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in Cristin

• Ødegaard, Marte; Malovic, Ivana; Tønnessen Kalvik, Skjalg & Clarke, Sara (2022). Bibliotekets prosjektoppgave-klinikk ved UiO: Akutt intensivundervisning for medisinstudenter.
• Ødegaard, Marte; Malovic, Ivana; Kalvik, Skjalg Tønnessen & Clarke, Sara (2022). The Library’s Project Thesis Clinic. Show summary

  Introduction What do we do when library teaching does not fit into the academic schedule? In response to this challenge, we started a project to provide information literacy teaching “just in time”. A common challenge faced by academic libraries is reduced time granted to course- integrated teaching of information literacy. This raises the concern that students will not obtain the necessary information literacy skills required for their studies. In this presentation we describe how we met these challenges through the creation of freestanding courses covering central aspects of information literacy, tailored to medical students. The catalyst for this course was the project thesis (20 ECTS) that the students complete as part of their professional education. The project thesis requires that students complete an independent scientific work wherein they specialize in a chosen field or innovation project. The project thesis is completed over a two-year period where January in year one contains courses in evidence-based medicine (EBM) and how to do a research project, and year two includes two teaching-free periods dedicated to project thesis work. The long time lag between the course in EBM and the individual study-period makes it difficult for the students to apply what they have learned. This leads to periodically increased pressure on the library due to the large number of students requesting instruction during their periods of self-directed learning. Aim The aim of this project was to find a solution to the added pressure on library services during the project thesis period by creating a suite of freestanding courses tailored specifically to the needs of the students. We had the following questions in the development of the project: · At which time will the students find the courses most useful? · How do we ensure that students get timely information when the project thesis stretches over a two-year period, and when faculty leaves little room for practical training in information skills? · How do we ensure the teaching we provide is relevant and covers the necessary topics? Program Description We created a collection of freestanding courses named the Project thesis clinic. The Project Thesis Clinic (PTC) lasts for a month and includes courses on academic writing, literature searching, critical appraisal, citing scientific literature, and individual guidance. Evaluation High attendance and positive feedback from the first clinic in 2021 showed the PTC was successful, which prompted the library to plan it again for January 2022. We adjusted the program based on feedback from the students in 2021 and aim to collect feedback in January 2022 using evaluation forms after the clinic has taken place. Conclusion This project has allowed us to test new teaching approaches, as well as ensuring that students receive required information literacy training “just-in-time” for when it is required. The global pandemic and need for digital solutions have also affected how the project has been developed. Human Touch Medical students feel the library provides them with the tools needed for success in their project.

• Ødegaard, Marte (2021). SMH-bloggen: BISON: Bibliotekarer Involvert i Systematiske Oversikter i Norge.
• Ødegaard, Marte (2021). Emneord og tekstord. Når brukes hva? Hvordan fungerer en tesaurus?
• Gundersen, Malene Wøhlk; Opheim, Elin & Ødegaard, Marte (2021). BISON – et sted å høre til. Show summary

  BISON – et sted å høre til For bibliotekarer som på varierende vis er involvert i systematiske oversikter er BISON stedet å være med over 130 medlemmer på tvers av fag, geografi, institusjoner og erfaring. Og bedre skal det bli! Gjennom deltakelse i vår interaktive BISON-bingo bidrar du i vårt felles, faglige nettverk og kan påvirke hvilke kurs og seminarer som arrangeres, utveksle erfaringer og få med deg gullkorn fra «The Best of BISON».

• Ødegaard, Marte (2020). Introduksjon av BISON: Bibliotekarer involvert i systematiske oversikter i Norge.
• Varsi, Cecilie; Solberg Nes, Lise ; Kristjansdottir, Olöf Birna; Stenberg, Una; Zangi, Heidi Andersen & Kelders, Saskia M [Show all 14 contributors for this article] (2019). Implementering av e-helseløsninger for pasienter med kronisk sykdom - Review av implementeringsstrategier.
• Varsi, Cecilie; Nes, Lise Solberg; Kristjansdottir, Olöf Birna; Stenberg, Una; Zangi, Heidi Andersen & Kelders, Saskia M [Show all 14 contributors for this article] (2019). Implementeringsstrategier benyttet ved implementering av e-helseløsninger for pasienter med kronisk sykdom.
• Varsi, Cecilie; Nes, Lise Solberg; Kristjansdottir, Olöf Birna; Stenberg, Una; Zangi, Heidi Andersen & Kelders, Saskia M [Show all 14 contributors for this article] (2018). Implementation Strategies used for the Implementation of e-health Interventions for patients with chronic illness – a systematic literature review.
• Varsi, Cecilie; Solberg Nes, Lise; Weiss, Karen; Kelders, Saskia M; Kristjansdottir, Olöf Birna & Zangi, Heidi Andersen [Show all 13 contributors for this article] (2018). Implementation Strategies used in the implementation of ehealth interventions.
• Ødegaard, Marte & Aamodt, Mikaela (2018). Systematiske oversikter - nye utfordringer og nye muligheter for fagbiblioteket. Bob : Bok og bibliotek. ISSN 0006-5811. 85(2), p. 64–65.
• Ødegaard, Marte & Skagen, Therese (2017). Reference interview for systematic review searches. Show summary

  Title: Reference interview for systematic review searches Introduction: Librarians are often asked to contribute to systematic reviews with a systematic literature search. In order to make sure methodological requirements are followed and consensus on the work to be done we have created an interview guide for the reference interview for systematic review searches. The interview guide will also help unexperienced librarians gain methodological skills. Aim: The aim is to highlight the reference interview as an important tool preparing for systematic review searching. Method: The interview guide is based on previously published literature on reference interviews, methodology literature for systematic reviews and own experiences. Results: The interview guide contain questions tailored to confirm that a systematic review is being made and to highlight topics related to methodology of the literature search. The aim is that the reference interview should be a simple and convenient tool to prepare for systematic review searches. Conclusion: This poster demonstrates elements to include in a reference interview tailored for systematic review searching. The interview guide is easy to use in communication with researchers and useful in in-house training. Keywords: systematic review, reference interview, librarian’s role, research, check list

• Ødegaard, Marte; Søyland, Marte Jørgensdatter; Skagen, Therese & Yilmaz, Muharrem (2016). UX på Medisinsk Bibliotek.
• Ødegaard, Marte & Skagen, Therese (2016). Intervjuguide for litteratursøk til systematiske oversikter.
• Ødegaard, Marte (2015). SMH-bloggen: #UKMedLibs chat Online Twitter journal club.
• Ødegaard, Marte (2015). SMH-bloggen: HLA Online Journal Club.
• Austrheim, Gunhild Helene; Bech, Mia; Cutler, Ingrid; Gasparini, Andrea; Haraldsen, Kirsten Borse & Kavli, Fredrik Andersen [Show all 16 contributors for this article] (2015). PhD on Track – online library support for PhD students. Show summary

  PhD on Track – online library support for PhD students Austrheim, Gunhild5; Bech, Mia 3; Cutler, Ingrid 2; Gasparini, Andrea Alessandro1; Haraldsen, Kirsten Borse 1; Kavli, Fredrik 4; Konestabo, Heidi Sjursen1; Lundmark, Anders Mattias1; Mikki, Susanne 2; Roos, Monica 5; Rullestad, Tove 2; Skagen, Therese1; Torras, Maria-Carme 5; Westbye, Hilde 1; Ødegaard, Marte 1; Gullbekk, Eystein1 Presenter: Kirsten Borse Haraldsen: k.b.haraldsen@ub.uio.no 1Oslo University Library, 2Bergen University Library, 3Aalborg University Library, 4Norwegian School of Economics, Library, 5Bergen University College, Library, In order to become skilled researchers within their specific field, PhD students must master a number of so-called generic or professional skills. These include to publish scientific results, efficiently navigate different sources of information and literature, and to understand how measurements of scientific impact may affect funding and career opportunities. The students may also encounter ethical dilemmas, such as handling different co-author practices, disagreements on publication channels, and open access publishing. In a collaborative effort five Scandinavian research and university libraries have developed the free online resource PhD on Track, to help address these skills and knowledge needs of PhD students. The resource is primarily aimed at inexperienced PhD students, but may also prove valuable to more experienced researchers. In our poster we present the different elements of PhD on Track, highlight some of its potential uses and point to discussions of libraries as legitimate actors in PhD students’ research and learning. We value input from the research communities in an effort to include more specific resources and topics targeted at the biochemical and biological researchers, e.g. about research data repositories, and funding in cross-disciplinary framework programs. The www.phdontrack.net site was launched in 2013 and is already used as a resource in 7 countries. It is built on the results of an empirical study of PhD candidates practices and experienced challenges (Gullbekk et al 2012), conceived as part of the collaborative project “Information Management for Knowledge Creation” funded by the Norwegian National Library. Reference: Gullbekk, E., Rullestad, T., & Torras i Calvo, M.-C. (ed.) (2012). PhD candidates and the research process: The library's contribution. (Vol. 8). Oslo: Universitetsbiblioteket i Oslo.

• Ødegaard, Marte (2014). A study of knowledge management among last year medical students: implications for the library.
• Gullbekk, Eystein; Lundmark, Anders Mattias; Attinger, Gisela; Bech, Mia; Cutler, Ingrid & Folkestad, Hege [Show all 18 contributors for this article] (2014). Helping PhD-students succeed: PhD on Track.
• Ødegaard, Marte; Lund, Hans & Austrheim, Gunhild (2019). Journal requirements for reporting systematic review searching: a survey of author instructions. Høgskulen i Bergen. Show summary

  Abstract Introduction To use systematic reviews to inform clinical guidelines, the methodology needs to be conducted and reported in an open and reproducible manner. Studies show that reporting of literature searches is poor despite that there are reporting guidelines. This survey investigates which requirements on systematic review searching journals include in their author instructions. Methods A cross sectional survey was conducted. The sample consist of 179 medical journals. The journals´ author instructions were reviewed and any information regarding requirements for reporting literature searches was collected and categorized. Results Of the 179 journals, 54% included instructions on how to report systematic review searches; by the use of established reporting guidelines (48%), mostly PRISMA, or journal specific requirements (24%). 6% of the journals rely only on journal specific requirements. The most requested reporting items are 1) Search strategy should be reported (14%), 2) Databases/ information-/ data sources (12%) and 3) Describe search methods/ process (9%). Discussion Reporting items in journal specific requirements are reflecting the content of established reporting guidelines. There are some additional reporting items not covered by the reporting guidelines. To a great extent, in journals recommending reporting guidelines, the journals specific requirements included are overlapping with the content of the recommended reporting guidelines. Journals only relying on journal specific requirements, have few and vague reporting items. Keywords: systematic reviews as topic (MeSH), systematic review searching, literature search, reporting, journal author instructions

View all works in Cristin