Marte Ødegaard

• Varsi, Cecilie; Solberg Nes, Lise ; Kristjansdottir, Olöf Birna; Kelders, Saskia M.; Stenberg, Una & Zangi, Heidi Andersen [Show all 13 contributors for this article] (2019). Implementation strategies to enhance the implementation of ehealth programs for patients with chronic illnesses: Realist systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. ISSN 1438-8871. 21(9). doi: 10.2196/14255. Full text in Research Archive

View all works in Cristin

• Ødegaard, Marte (2021). Emneord og tekstord. Når brukes hva? Hvordan fungerer en tesaurus?
• Gundersen, Malene Wøhlk; Opheim, Elin & Ødegaard, Marte (2021). BISON – et sted å høre til. Show summary

  BISON – et sted å høre til For bibliotekarer som på varierende vis er involvert i systematiske oversikter er BISON stedet å være med over 130 medlemmer på tvers av fag, geografi, institusjoner og erfaring. Og bedre skal det bli! Gjennom deltakelse i vår interaktive BISON-bingo bidrar du i vårt felles, faglige nettverk og kan påvirke hvilke kurs og seminarer som arrangeres, utveksle erfaringer og få med deg gullkorn fra «The Best of BISON».

• Ødegaard, Marte (2020). Introduksjon av BISON: Bibliotekarer involvert i systematiske oversikter i Norge.
• Varsi, Cecilie; Solberg Nes, Lise ; Kristjansdottir, Olöf Birna; Stenberg, Una; Zangi, Heidi Andersen & Kelders, Saskia M [Show all 14 contributors for this article] (2019). Implementering av e-helseløsninger for pasienter med kronisk sykdom - Review av implementeringsstrategier.
• Varsi, Cecilie; Nes, Lise Solberg; Kristjansdottir, Olöf Birna; Stenberg, Una; Zangi, Heidi Andersen & Kelders, Saskia M [Show all 14 contributors for this article] (2019). Implementeringsstrategier benyttet ved implementering av e-helseløsninger for pasienter med kronisk sykdom.
• Varsi, Cecilie; Nes, Lise Solberg; Kristjansdottir, Olöf Birna; Stenberg, Una; Zangi, Heidi Andersen & Kelders, Saskia M [Show all 14 contributors for this article] (2018). Implementation Strategies used for the Implementation of e-health Interventions for patients with chronic illness – a systematic literature review.
• Varsi, Cecilie; Solberg Nes, Lise; Weiss, Karen; Kelders, Saskia M; Kristjansdottir, Olöf Birna & Zangi, Heidi Andersen [Show all 13 contributors for this article] (2018). Implementation Strategies used in the implementation of ehealth interventions.
• Ødegaard, Marte & Aamodt, Mikaela (2018). Systematiske oversikter - nye utfordringer og nye muligheter for fagbiblioteket. Bob : Bok og bibliotek. ISSN 0006-5811. 85(2), p. 64–65.
• Ødegaard, Marte & Skagen, Therese (2017). Reference interview for systematic review searches.
• Ødegaard, Marte; Søyland, Marte Jørgensdatter; Skagen, Therese & Yilmaz, Muharrem (2016). UX på Medisinsk Bibliotek.
• Ødegaard, Marte & Skagen, Therese (2016). Intervjuguide for litteratursøk til systematiske oversikter.
• Austrheim, Gunhild Helene; Bech, Mia; Cutler, Ingrid; Gasparini, Andrea; Haraldsen, Kirsten Borse & Kavli, Fredrik Andersen [Show all 16 contributors for this article] (2015). PhD on Track – online library support for PhD students. Show summary

  PhD on Track – online library support for PhD students Austrheim, Gunhild5; Bech, Mia 3; Cutler, Ingrid 2; Gasparini, Andrea Alessandro1; Haraldsen, Kirsten Borse 1; Kavli, Fredrik 4; Konestabo, Heidi Sjursen1; Lundmark, Anders Mattias1; Mikki, Susanne 2; Roos, Monica 5; Rullestad, Tove 2; Skagen, Therese1; Torras, Maria-Carme 5; Westbye, Hilde 1; Ødegaard, Marte 1; Gullbekk, Eystein1 Presenter: Kirsten Borse Haraldsen: k.b.haraldsen@ub.uio.no 1Oslo University Library, 2Bergen University Library, 3Aalborg University Library, 4Norwegian School of Economics, Library, 5Bergen University College, Library, In order to become skilled researchers within their specific field, PhD students must master a number of so-called generic or professional skills. These include to publish scientific results, efficiently navigate different sources of information and literature, and to understand how measurements of scientific impact may affect funding and career opportunities. The students may also encounter ethical dilemmas, such as handling different co-author practices, disagreements on publication channels, and open access publishing. In a collaborative effort five Scandinavian research and university libraries have developed the free online resource PhD on Track, to help address these skills and knowledge needs of PhD students. The resource is primarily aimed at inexperienced PhD students, but may also prove valuable to more experienced researchers. In our poster we present the different elements of PhD on Track, highlight some of its potential uses and point to discussions of libraries as legitimate actors in PhD students’ research and learning. We value input from the research communities in an effort to include more specific resources and topics targeted at the biochemical and biological researchers, e.g. about research data repositories, and funding in cross-disciplinary framework programs. The www.phdontrack.net site was launched in 2013 and is already used as a resource in 7 countries. It is built on the results of an empirical study of PhD candidates practices and experienced challenges (Gullbekk et al 2012), conceived as part of the collaborative project “Information Management for Knowledge Creation” funded by the Norwegian National Library. Reference: Gullbekk, E., Rullestad, T., & Torras i Calvo, M.-C. (ed.) (2012). PhD candidates and the research process: The library's contribution. (Vol. 8). Oslo: Universitetsbiblioteket i Oslo.

• Ødegaard, Marte (2014). A study of knowledge management among last year medical students: implications for the library.
• Gullbekk, Eystein; Lundmark, Anders Mattias; Attinger, Gisela; Bech, Mia; Cutler, Ingrid & Folkestad, Hege [Show all 18 contributors for this article] (2014). Helping PhD-students succeed: PhD on Track.
• Ødegaard, Marte (2019). Journal requirements for reporting systematic review searching: a survey of author instructions. Høgskulen i Bergen. Show summary

  Abstract Introduction To use systematic reviews to inform clinical guidelines, the methodology needs to be conducted and reported in an open and reproducible manner. Studies show that reporting of literature searches is poor despite that there are reporting guidelines. This survey investigates which requirements on systematic review searching journals include in their author instructions. Methods A cross sectional survey was conducted. The sample consist of 179 medical journals. The journals´ author instructions were reviewed and any information regarding requirements for reporting literature searches was collected and categorized. Results Of the 179 journals, 54% included instructions on how to report systematic review searches; by the use of established reporting guidelines (48%), mostly PRISMA, or journal specific requirements (24%). 6% of the journals rely only on journal specific requirements. The most requested reporting items are 1) Search strategy should be reported (14%), 2) Databases/ information-/ data sources (12%) and 3) Describe search methods/ process (9%). Discussion Reporting items in journal specific requirements are reflecting the content of established reporting guidelines. There are some additional reporting items not covered by the reporting guidelines. To a great extent, in journals recommending reporting guidelines, the journals specific requirements included are overlapping with the content of the recommended reporting guidelines. Journals only relying on journal specific requirements, have few and vague reporting items. Keywords: systematic reviews as topic (MeSH), systematic review searching, literature search, reporting, journal author instructions

View all works in Cristin