Litteraturliste/ bibliografi

I arbeidet med prosjektet er mye litteratur gjennomgått. Her gir vi en tematisk oversikt over noe av litteraturen.

Bibliotekarens rolle i arbeidet med systematiske oversikter

Kompetanse hos bibliotekar

  • Folb BL, Klem ML, Youk AO, Dahm JJ, He M, Ketchum AM, et al. Continuing education for systematic reviews: a prospective longitudinal assessment of a workshop for librarians. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA. 2020;108(1):36-46.

  • Grossetta Nardini HK, Batten J, Funaro MC, Garcia-Milian R, Nyhan K, Spak JM, et al. Librarians as methodological peer reviewers for systematic reviews: results of an online survey. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:23-.

  • Spencer AJ, Eldredge JD. Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review. 2018. 2018;106(1):11.

  • Townsend WA, Anderson PF, Ginier EC, MacEachern MP, Saylor KM, Shipman BL, et al. A competency framework for librarians involved in systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA. 2017;105(3):268-75. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5490706/pdf/jmla-105-268.pdf

     

Bibliotekar som medforfatter

  • Aamodt, M., Huurdeman, H. & Strømme, H. (2019). Librarian Co-Authored Systematic Reviews are Associated with Lower Risk of Bias Compared to Systematic Reviews with Acknowledgement of Librarians or No Participation by Librarians. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29601

  • Meert, D., Torabi, N. & Costella, J. (2016). Impact of librarians on reporting of the literature searching component of pediatric systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 104(4), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.3163/1536-5050.104.4.004
  • Rethlefsen, M. L., Farrell, A. M., Osterhaus Trzasko, L. C. & Brigham, T. J. (2015). Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(6), 617-626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.025
  • Rethlefsen, M. L., Murad, M. & Livingston, E. H. (2014). Engaging medical librarians to improve the quality of review articles. JAMA, 312(10), 999-1000. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.9263

Utvikling av tjenestetilbud

  • Foster, M. & Jewell, S. (2017). Assembling the pieces of a systematic review : a guide for librarians Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Fowler, S. A., Yaeger, L. H. & Kelly, B. (2013). Creating and managing a systematic review service. Innlegg presentert ved Medical Library Association Annual Meeting and Exhibition, Boston. Abstract hentet fra http://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/becker_pubs/38
  • Grønlund, I. L., Gundersen, M. W., Korvald, T., Karlsen, E., Tangen, A., Thorvik, C. & Ødemark, I. L. (2018). Systematiske litteratursøk til salgs: Ny tjeneste fra biblioteket. Nordic journal of information literacy in higher education, 10(1), 81-87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15845/noril.v10i1.286
  • Hardi, A. C. & Fowler, S. A. (2014). Evidence-based medicine and systematic review services at Becker Medical Library. Missouri Medicine, 111(5), 416-418. Hentet fra https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6172095/pdf/ms111_p0416.pdf
  • Jewell, S. & Gibson, D. S. (2014). Nine Steps to a Systematic Review Service. MLA News, 54(2), 11-11.
  • Knehans, A., Dell, E. & Robinson, C. (2016). Starting a Fee-Based Systematic Review Service. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 35(3), 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2016.1189779
  • Ludeman, E., Downton, K., Shipper, A. G. & Fu, Y. (2015). Developing a library systematic review service: a case study. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 34(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2015.1019323
  • Manley, A., Helwig, M., Boutet, M. & Visintini, S. (2018). Research Support in Health Sciences Libraries: A Scoping Review. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association / Journal de l'Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada, 39(2), 56-78. https://doi.org/10.29173/jchla29366
  • McKeown, S. (2017). Developing a Formal Systematic Review Service. Innlegg presentert ved EAHIL, Dublin.
  • McKeown, S. & Ross-White, A. (2019). Building capacity for librarian support and addressing collaboration challenges by formalizing library systematic review services. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 107(3), 411-419. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.443
  • Nicholson, J., McCrillis, A. & Williams, J. D. (2017). Collaboration challenges in systematic reviews: a survey of health sciences librarians. 2017, 105(4), 9. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.176
  • Riegelman, A. & Kocher, M. (2018). For Your Enrichment: A Model for Developing and Implementing a Systematic Review Service for Disciplines outside of the Health Sciences. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 58(1). https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.58.1.6837
  • Roth, S. & Burstein, K. Implementing a Formal Systematic Review Service in an Academic Health Science Library Setting.
  • Roth, S. C. (2018). Transforming the systematic review service: a team-based model to support the educational needs of researchers. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 514-520. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.430
  • Stenholt, L., Petersen, L. J. & Skrubbeltrang, C. (2018). Initial experiences of embedded librarianship at a Danish University Hospital. Journal of EAHIL, 14(2), 12-17.

Studenter og systematiske oversikter

  • Hanneke, R. (2018). The hidden benefits of helping students with systematic reviews. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(2), 244-247. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.420
  • Puljak, L. (2017). If there is only one author or only one database was searched, a study should not be called a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 91, 4-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.002
  • Wissinger, C. L. (2018). Is there a place for undergraduate and graduate students in the systematic review process? Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(2), 248-250. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.387

Tidsbruk på arbeidet med systematiske oversikter

  • Borah, R., Brown, A. W., Capers, P. L. & Kaiser, K. A. (2017). Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry. BMJ Open, 7(2), e012545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545

  • Bullers, K., Howard, A. M., Hanson, A., Kearns, W. D., Orriola, J. J., Polo, R. L. & Sakmar, K. A. (2018). It takes longer than you think: librarian time spent on systematic review tasks. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(2), 198-207. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2018.323

 

Publisert 6. feb. 2020 18:51 - Sist endret 26. mars 2020 14:04